Download high-resolution image Look inside
Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio play button
0:00
0:00

King of Kings

The Iranian Revolution: A Story of Hubris, Delusion and Catastrophic Miscalculation

Look inside
Listen to a clip from the audiobook
audio play button
0:00
0:00
Paperback
$25.00 US
On sale Aug 04, 2026 | 528 Pages | 9780593315668

See Additional Formats
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • WINNER OF THE KIRKUS PRIZE • From the author of the landmark bestseller Lawrence in Arabia comes a stunningly revelatory narrative history of the Iranian Revolution, one of the most momentous events in modern times. This groundbreaking work exposes the jaw-dropping stupidity of the American government and traces the rise of religious nationalism, offering essential insights into today's global unrest.

On New Year’s Eve 1977, President Jimmy Carter toasted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, extolling Iran as “an island of stability” due to “your leadership and to the respect and the admiration and love which your people give to you.” The shah, known as the King of Kings, seemed invulnerable, and he was invaluable to the United States as an ally in the Cold War. Twelve and a half months later, the shah fled Iran into exile, forced from the throne by a volcanic religious revolution led by a fiery cleric named Ayatollah Khomeini. How could the United States have been so blind?

Based on voluminous research and dozens of interviews, Scott Anderson weaves the spellbinding story of a dictator oblivious to the disdain of his subjects and a super­power blundering into disaster. The Iranian Revolution, Anderson convincingly argues, was as world-shattering an event as the French and Russian Revolutions. Around the globe, including in the United States, the hatred of economically marginalized, religiously fervent masses for a wealthy secular elite has led to violence and upheaval—and Iran was the tem­plate. King of Kings is a bravura work of history, and a warning.
PREFACE

“The Shah will be an active participant in Iranian life well into the 1980s. . . . There will be no radical change in Iranian political behavior in the near future.” —secret CIA report, “Iran in the 1980s,” August 1977, five months before the start of revolution

At about 10:20 on the morning of November 15, 1977, two Sikorsky Sea King helicopters came in low across the Potomac River and made for the flat grassy expanse at the southern base of the Washington Monument. The green- and-white helicopters with their military insignia were part of the presidential fleet known as HMX-1, and on board the lead aircraft was the shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, together with his wife, Farah, and a small royal entourage. The primary purpose of the trailing helicopter was to serve as a decoy.

Waiting alongside the helipad were half a dozen black limousines, along with several Secret Service vehicles and a phalanx of motorcycle police outriders. For security reasons, only a handful of officials knew which limousine would transport the shah to the White House, a mere half a mile away. It was the Iranian monarch’s twelfth visit to the United States since assuming the imperial throne thirty-six years before. Over the course of those visits, he had met at the White House with six different American presidents, beginning with Harry Truman. He was now about to meet his seventh: Jimmy Carter.

The shah had been apprehensive about this trip, and for two good reasons. In winning the presidency the previous year, Carter had campaigned on a reformist, clean-government platform. This included, the former governor of Georgia promised, a new emphasis on protecting human rights around the world and a critical reexamination of American arms sales to dictatorial regimes. Both these promises cast an uncomfortable spotlight on Iran. In recent years, a number of organizations had harshly assailed the shah’s regime over its human rights record, and Iran was far and away the largest purchaser of American weapons systems, accounting for nearly half of all such sales in recent years. Senior Carter administration officials had quietly offered the shah reassurances that these high-minded pledges did not apply to him, but the Iranian leader was understandably anxious to hear this from the president personally.

This was joined by a more immediate concern. By 1977, some fifty thousand Iranian students were studying at colleges and universities in the United States, and in recent days a sizable portion of them—as many as four thousand, by some reports—had begun converging on Washington to protest his visit. While overwhelmingly young leftists, their numbers were augmented by a smattering of older Iranian dissidents and exiles, as well as American human rights activists, and they had vowed to give the shah a noisy and embarrassing reception. In fact, they had already put the monarch on notice the previous day, when he had stayed at the preserved colonial village of Williamsburg, Virginia; during the night, the royal couple’s sleep was interrupted by chants from several hundred anti-shah demonstrators gathered a short distance away. Lending their appearance a disquieting quality, many concealed their faces behind paper masks, necessary protection, they claimed, against identification by the shah’s secret police.

In anticipation of the unpleasantness likely to play out in Washington, the Iranian government had reportedly arranged for hundreds of pro-regime members of the Iranian American community to be flown or bused into the capital, including Iranian air force cadets undergoing training at Laughlin Air Force Base in Texas. Along with banners extolling the shah’s leadership and U.S.-Iranian friendship, the pro-shah organizers had distributed two-sided solidarity flags: the U.S. emblem on one side, the Iranian on the other. By midmorning, a forewarned D.C. police force had isolated the two factions on either side of the Ellipse, the great lawn stretching just below the White House, but it made for a tense scene; penned behind flimsy strips of snow fencing about five hundred feet apart, the two groups hurled insults at each other through megaphones, their volume and intensity growing as the time for the shah’s scheduled arrival at the White House drew nearer.

That morning found me on the Ellipse as well, strolling among the police and the handful of reporters occupying the no-man’s-land between the two sides. I was eighteen years old and employed at the Treasury Department headquarters building, immediately adjacent to the White House, as a special aide to the secretary of the Treasury. The nice-sounding title notwithstanding, I was essentially an errand boy, and because the secretary at the time, W. Michael Blumenthal, required very little in the way of erranding, I spent most of my working hours strolling about the city in search of something interesting to do. On the morning of November 15, 1977, nothing looked quite so interesting as the spectacle unfolding on the Ellipse.

At about 10:30 a.m., the shah’s motorcade swung through the iron gates of the White House and came up its semicircular drive, an occasion marked by the start of a twenty-one-gun salute. In hindsight, this customary honor for a visiting head of state might have been a mistake, for the anti-shah protesters on the eastern side of the Ellipse seemed to interpret it rather like the firing of a starting gun. In an instant, hundreds broke through the snow fencing holding them back and began a charge across the great lawn for their opponents. While some of the pro-shah supporters started to flee in panic, a number of the younger men in their midst—the military cadets, judging by their builds and crew cuts—grabbed up whatever potential weapons lay close at hand and similarly rushed forward to battle. Suddenly no-man’s-land, rapidly shrinking as it was, didn’t seem such a great place to be.

For the next two or three minutes—it felt longer at the time—the Ellipse was the scene of a kind of massive street brawl, fists and feet flying, people sent tumbling or running or crawling, such that it was quite impossible to determine who was getting the better of whom. Nor could I be certain of the affiliation of the demonstrator who struck me across the back with a wooden stave with such force it sent me momentarily to the ground, although the power of the blow led me to suspect one of the more physically fit military cadets over some leftist graduate student. When finally the police rushed in with tear gas and billy clubs, there were already a good number of injured scattered about the lawn.

For the ceremony welcoming the shah to the White House, a rostrum had been erected on the South Lawn, before which several hundred invited guests were gathered to hear his and the president’s opening remarks. In hindsight, this tradition, too, was probably a mistake, for no sooner had the two leaders, along with their wives, mounted the stage than the first wafts of the tear gas discharged on the Ellipse began to envelop them. In a famous series of photos taken at the time, both couples try to maintain dignified poses as tears stream down their cheeks.

Concluding the embarrassing display on the South Lawn as quickly as possible—Jimmy Carter would later joke that it was one of the shortest speeches he ever gave—the two couples retreated to the healthier air inside the White House. As Rosalynn Carter led Farah and her entourage off for a coffee reception and traditional “ladies’ tour” of the White House, the two heads of state proceeded to the Cabinet Room, two doors down from the Oval Office. For this meeting, the shah was joined by only two advisors, in contrast to the array of American officials who sat oppo site: President Carter, Vice President Walter Mondale, National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, along with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and several other senior State Department officials.

Also seated at the table was the chief National Security Council (NSC) officer in charge of Iranian affairs, a forty-two-year-old navy captain named Gary Sick. Although he had carried the Iran portfolio at the NSC for two years, Sick was seeing the shah for the first time. “My first thought was how delicate he seemed,” he recalled. “Very elegant, very refined, with this ramrod-straight posture, but the overall impression was of someone rather delicate. From all I’d read about him, all the newsreels I’d watched, I don’t know that I was quite prepared for that.”

There is often a platitudinous quality to these preliminary White House meetings with foreign heads of state, pleasantries combined with an overview of matters to be addressed in more detail later. While the November 15 meeting contained an element of this, it also proved unusually substantive. Several times President Carter stressed that he not only appreciated America’s “special relationship” with Iran but wished to find ways to strengthen it further, a tacit sign that the shah would hear few concerns from the new administration over Iran’s human rights record or profligate arms purchases. For his part, the Iranian king repeated a promise not to seek an increase in oil prices at the upcoming meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), welcome news from the man who’d long been the chief agent of such hikes.

Throughout the ninety-minute meeting, Gary Sick was struck by the shah’s commanding manner. “On our side of the table, there was a lot of informal discussion back-and-forth, but I can’t recall the shah even looking at the two guys he was with; they certainly didn’t have speaking parts. But this was his element: the planned meeting, the laid-out agenda. I found him very impressive, just thoroughly prepared on whatever topic came up.”

Despite the wariness with which the shah had approached this state visit and the chaos accompanying his arrival, it quickly became evident that he and Carter enjoyed a personal rapport, so much so that by the time he and the shahbanou left Washington the following afternoon, the king was in an ebullient mood. To an American diplomat he remarked that the visit could not possibly have gone better, while to a palace advisor he allowed that it was one of the most fruitful trips he had ever made to the American capital. Back in Iran, the state-controlled media carried banner headlines extolling the King of Kings’ triumphant foray abroad, while the consensus in Carter’s White House was that the two days of meetings had been a tremendous success, a further strengthening of the long- standing American-Iranian alliance.

Yet the occasion posed a couple of troubling questions should anyone have chosen to take notice. The violent demonstrations of November 15 had left well over a hundred injured, including twenty-nine policemen, making it the worst day of civil unrest in the nation’s capital in nearly a decade. Fistfights between the warring factions had extended even into the city’s emergency rooms, requiring hospital security guards to segregate pro- and anti-shah demonstrators awaiting medical treatment. Many of the estimated four thousand Iranian students who had come to Washington to denounce the shah were drawn from their nation’s middle and upper classes, and if this was the outlook of those who had most greatly benefited from his rule, what might it say about those inside Iran who lacked such privilege? And while most of the anti-shah demonstrators identified as leftists, they had been joined by members of several conservative Muslim religious groups, so that interspersed with the placards decrying the monarch as a right-wing fascist and American lackey were others accusing him of betraying Islam. Some of those in this latter category carried placards bearing the likeness of one of the shah’s bitterest critics, an aging cleric virtually unknown outside Iran named Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. When was the last time that Washington, or any nation’s capital, saw secular leftists and religious fundamentalists march together in common cause?

But no one did take notice—at least no one in a position to do something about it. Instead, no sooner had the shah departed Washington than White House aides set to planning President Carter’s reciprocal visit to Iran, scheduled for a mere six weeks later, the better to capitalize on the progress being made. At this second meeting, Carter repeated the praise he had showered on the king at the White House, noting that “thanks to the leadership of the shah, Iran is an island of stability in a troubled region.”

Once again, it was almost as if some psychological starting gun had been fired, for within days of Carter’s fulsome tribute there occurred inside Iran the first significant anti-shah protests in over a decade. Initially, these demonstrations were small and easily scattered, but within a few weeks they had metastasized and turned violent. Still, few took notice. By the spring of 1978, protesters had taken to the streets of almost every Iranian town of any size, their cause now imbued with a distinctly religious tilt, but it was only then, six months after his likeness had appeared on demonstrators’ posters in Washington, that The New York Times thought to identify the shah’s chief nemesis, Ruhollah Khomeini, for the first time while managing to get his first name wrong. But still it got worse, and still very few grasped the extent. By that December, with Iran paralyzed by strikes and sliding toward civil war, the death toll from its street battles now reaching into the thousands—into the tens of thousands, according to the opposition—President Carter could still profess full confidence in the shah’s ability to right the situation and persevere. And then, just weeks later, the once unimaginable: After thirty-seven years, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, King of Kings, Light of the Aryans, Shadow of God on Earth, was simply no more, cast into a wandering exile as his regime was engulfed by a revolution few saw coming and none knew how to stop.
  • WINNER | 2025
    Kirkus Prize for Non-Fiction
  • FINALIST | 2026
    Pulitzer Prize (History)
  • SHORTLIST | 2025
    National Book Critics Circle Awards
© Nanette Burstein
Scott Anderson is a veteran war correspondent who has reported from Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Northern Ireland, Chechnya, Sudan, Bosnia, El Salvador and many other strife-torn countries. A contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine, his work has also appeared in Vanity Fair, Esquire, Harper’s and Outside. He is the author of two novels and six works of nonfiction, including Lawrence in Arabia, an international bestseller, and most recently King of Kings, the story of the 1978-79 Iranian Revolution, and winner of the 2025 Kirkus Prize for nonfiction. View titles by Scott Anderson
Named a Best Book of the Year by The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, and Vanity Fair

“[A] masterly new account of the Iranian revolution, illustrates the stubborn American blindness that hastened the shah’s demise and helped the mullahs prevail. It was an ‘obliviousness’ that ‘became willful, an ignorance to be maintained and defended,’ Anderson writes. . . . This is an exceptional and important book. Scrupulous and enterprising reporting rarely combine with such superb storytelling.” The New York Times

“Mr. Anderson is a first-rate writer of histories. . . . King of Kings is a sweeping, gripping book, one that makes past times and dead people (often weird, complex and evil) spring to life with its narrative verve and attention to detail. . . . Riveting. . . . Exquisite.” The Wall Street Journal

“A masterful and propulsive account that chronicles a devastatingly transformative series of events whose aftereffects reverberate to this day.” —The Kirkus Prize 2025 Jury

“Anderson succeeds precisely because he eschews structural, quasi-philosophical queries for an energetic account that concerns itself with, as he puts it, ‘a few core questions’. . . . As a result of this inquiry, Anderson finds an answer at once simpler, more instructive, and truer than those of many scholars. . . . Anderson has also consulted the best scholarship on the revolution. . . . Anderson thus offers a readable page-turner that’s also attuned to those core questions. . . . Anderson’s book [is] one of the best on 1979.” The Atlantic

“Veteran journalist Anderson takes readers through the final years of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s regime in Iran, tracing the political machinations that kept him in power and the corruption that helped turn the Iranian public against him. It is attentive to both the shah’s own oblivious rule and the world-historical mistakes that his American allies made in their attempt to prop him up.” The Washington Post

King of Kings reads like a blend of a le Carré novel and a Coen Brothers film in the best possible way.” Vanity Fair

“Timely. . . . King of Kings is a lively tale of palace intrigue.” The New Yorker

“Absorbing. . . . Meticulously reported. . . . riveting.” Air Mail

“The outlines of the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are already seared into the American psyche, but this spellbinding book adds fascinating texture and provides a salutary warning for policymakers today. Drawing on the accounts of major players—both American and Iranian—Anderson, a prize-winning journalist and novelist, reconstructs the missteps that contributed to the fall of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, the triumph of the Islamic Revolution, and the transformation of a major American ally into an apparently implacable enemy. . . . Absorbing.” —Foreign Affairs

“Rare is the non-fiction work that can be described as gripping, but King of Kings . . . earns the accolade. . . . Hubris, delusion and catastrophic miscalculation are the elements one expects to find in a Cold War spy thriller, perhaps by John Le Carré. Readers will find King of Kings equally enthralling. . . . A brilliant narrative-history that not only provides a thoroughly readable account of one of the seminal events of the past half-century, but also sheds a bright light on how the religio-political Middle East of 2025 came about. It is highly recommended.” —Jerusalem Post

“A masterful dissection of perhaps the most consequential strategic blunder of the late 20th century. . . . The book reads like a political thriller, yet every page is grounded in meticulous research and sharp analytical insight. . . . Prescient. . . . Compelling. . . . A remarkably engaging work of popular history. The book’s contemporary relevance cannot be overstated. . . . It stands as both a gripping historical narrative and a cautionary tale about the dangers of imperial overconfidence.” —The American Conservative

“Scott Anderson’s King of Kings is a riveting, masterfully told account of how the Shah’s downfall became a tragic turning point in history, as America stumbled blindly into a long and costly conflict that shadows the Middle East to this day. Anderson's clear analysis and vivid storytelling unravel one of the great miscalculations in America's postwar foreign policya must-read that is both urgent and unforgettable.” —Steve Coll, author of Directorate S, winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award, and Ghost Wars, winner of the Pulitzer Prize

“In his masterful and gripping account of the Iranian revolution, Scott Anderson gives us a page-turning history lesson that is more relevant than ever: A story of American diplomatic blunders and miscalculations that led to the loss of a vital ally and the commencement of hostilities that have roiled the world for nearly four decades. Taking us inside the fortified walls of the shah’s palaces, King of Kings lays bare the folly and hubris that led to the shah’s demise, the hostage crisis and a radical theocracy that would reshape the Middle East.”
—Rajiv Chandrasekaran, author of National Book Award finalist Imperial Life in the Emerald City

“Instantly absorbing, King of Kings is an exhilarating plunge into the psychology of unchecked power, which secludes, blinds, and ultimately betrays its holders. Anderson is a master of the telling detail; he gives us lessons not only from the Shah’s undoing but also from Washington’s weakness for rigid assumptions—until history, as it so often does, shatters the illusion of control.”
—Evan Osnos, author of the National Book Award winner Age of Ambition

“Anderson’s brilliant new account of the events leading to the shah’s fall is both masterful and mesmerizing. With bracing clarity, drawing from interviews with direct participants, King of Kings shows senior Iranian and U.S. officials sleepwalking into a disaster with global consequences—and one that was far from inevitable. A must-read for anyone looking to understand the origins of the Middle East’s most dangerous regime.”
—Joby Warrick, author of Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS, winner of the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction

“The Iranian Revolution was one of the most momentous events of the Twentieth Century, one whose reverberations continue to shape the Middle East. In this highly readable and probing book, Scott Anderson revisits the events of that critical year, and draws on previously unknown information to chart the course of events that made what seemed improbable to become inevitable: the fall of the monarchy before a triumphant revolution.”
—Vali Nasr, Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at the School of Advanced Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the author of Iran’s Grand Strategy: A Political History

“Scott Anderson’s thrilling, fully authoritative work takes us behind the scenes of US decision-making blunders as the country’s leaders fumbled the Iranian revolution, losing the US’s most critical ally in the Middle East. Nearly a half century later, this is the gold standard account of the Shah’s fall, with fresh dramatic tales and arresting details from the last living players. An epic and heart-breaking tragedy.”
—Azadeh Moaveni, author of Lipstick Jihad: A Memoir of Growing up Iranian in America and American in Iran

“Anderson uses his incomparable prose to crack open the deep story behind one of the most momentous events of the last decades. An important and riveting book.”
Sebastian Junger, New York Times bestselling author of The Perfect Storm and War

“Written with a journalist’s instincts and the plotlines of a thriller, King of Kings is the most compelling account yet of the revolution in Iran—an event so significant that it continues to shape world affairs today. An outstanding book.”
Eugene Rogan, author of The Fall of the Ottomans

“King of Kings chronicles the fall of Iran's Shah—a man feared by many but understood by few. This account examines how hubris, Cold War tensions, and revolutionary fervor toppled a monarchy whose ruler pursued modernization while remaining fatally disconnected from his people, the shockwaves of which still reverberate through international relations today.”
—Bradley Hope, bestselling co-author of Billion Dollar Whale and Blood and Oil

King of Kings delivers remarkable new insights into one of history’s least understood upheavals—the Iranian revolution. Rich in detail and gripping portraits of the individuals at the heart of the tragedy, this book gets to the essence of how this unique revolution succeeded—and why it cannot be replicated.”
Kim Ghattas, author of Black Wave

Scott Anderson vividly describes, in unerringly forensic detail, how American foreign policy makers completely misread—as indeed they continue to misread—the Middle East and all its complexities, with consequences that reverberate to this day.”
—Diana Darke, author of Stealing from the Saracens

“Wry, acute, forensically reported, deeply researched, King of Kings is a brilliantly absorbing, page-turning account of the Iranian Revolution. Scott Anderson is one of the very best narrative historians writing today. From the seething streets, to the filigree of Palace intrigue and the politics of American interests, he captures the opportunism, self-delusion and ineptitude that ploughed a furrow across the face of the modern Middle East. It’s a perfect lesson for our times: history has no idea what it’s doing.”
—Wendell Steavenson, author of The Weight of a Mustard Seed

“A clear-eyed account of a difficult, complex man and his self-inflicted fall from grace.” —The Guardian

“An excellent narrative account of the two tumultuous years that resulted in the triumph of Ayatollah Khomeini and the creation of an Islamic republic. . . . [Anderson] has done scrupulous research on the final months of the Shah’s fading rule.” —The Telegraph

“An authoritative, well-reported and elegantly written account of the fall of the Shah of Iran and the rise of the Ayatollah Khomeini. If you want to understand the turmoil in Gaza, Syria and beyond, then the Iranian Revolution of 1979 is a good place to start.” —The Times

“For those seeking to understand this seemingly endless state of conflict between Israel, the US and Iran and the blood-soaked rivalries that drive conflict in the Middle East today, Scott Anderson’s new book is a good place to start. King of Kings recounts how imperial Pahlavi Iran went form a hyper-rich, secular leaning ‘Peacock’ throne, firmly allied to the west, a playground for American oil executives to the dour, repressive Islamist autocracy we know today, locked in perpetual conflict within and without its borders, isolated and seeking a nuclear bomb. . . . Anderson brilliantly tells this tale.” —The Financial Times

“Chaos is strewn by foolhardy leaders acting on bad information in this riveting history of the Iranian revolution. . . . Anderson’s story builds a rushing momentum as one miscalculation after another hurtles the country toward the 1979 ‘revolution few saw coming and no one knew how to stop.’ The result is an illuminating, operatic depiction of the revolution as a farcical cavalcade of arrogant mistakes with dire consequences.”
Publishers Weekly (starred)

“As Anderson lays out with meticulous reporting and consummate storytelling, many of Iran’s spectacular gains—and along with them, its once-inviolable alliance with the U.S.—came undone with the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the ascent of Ayatollah Khomeini. . . . Though the Iranian Revolution unfolded more than 45 years ago, the now-fraught U.S.-Iran relationship remains front and center, and there are still hard-won lessons to glean about the costs of inattention.”
—Booklist
(starred)


“A thoroughgoing history of the last years of the Pahlavi dynasty and the rise of the Islamist theocracy in Iraq. . . . An eye-opening history of how Iran became a point on the ‘axis of evil’ and is considered such a dangerous enemy today.”
—Kirkus Reviews (starred)

About

NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • WINNER OF THE KIRKUS PRIZE • From the author of the landmark bestseller Lawrence in Arabia comes a stunningly revelatory narrative history of the Iranian Revolution, one of the most momentous events in modern times. This groundbreaking work exposes the jaw-dropping stupidity of the American government and traces the rise of religious nationalism, offering essential insights into today's global unrest.

On New Year’s Eve 1977, President Jimmy Carter toasted Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, extolling Iran as “an island of stability” due to “your leadership and to the respect and the admiration and love which your people give to you.” The shah, known as the King of Kings, seemed invulnerable, and he was invaluable to the United States as an ally in the Cold War. Twelve and a half months later, the shah fled Iran into exile, forced from the throne by a volcanic religious revolution led by a fiery cleric named Ayatollah Khomeini. How could the United States have been so blind?

Based on voluminous research and dozens of interviews, Scott Anderson weaves the spellbinding story of a dictator oblivious to the disdain of his subjects and a super­power blundering into disaster. The Iranian Revolution, Anderson convincingly argues, was as world-shattering an event as the French and Russian Revolutions. Around the globe, including in the United States, the hatred of economically marginalized, religiously fervent masses for a wealthy secular elite has led to violence and upheaval—and Iran was the tem­plate. King of Kings is a bravura work of history, and a warning.

Excerpt

PREFACE

“The Shah will be an active participant in Iranian life well into the 1980s. . . . There will be no radical change in Iranian political behavior in the near future.” —secret CIA report, “Iran in the 1980s,” August 1977, five months before the start of revolution

At about 10:20 on the morning of November 15, 1977, two Sikorsky Sea King helicopters came in low across the Potomac River and made for the flat grassy expanse at the southern base of the Washington Monument. The green- and-white helicopters with their military insignia were part of the presidential fleet known as HMX-1, and on board the lead aircraft was the shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, together with his wife, Farah, and a small royal entourage. The primary purpose of the trailing helicopter was to serve as a decoy.

Waiting alongside the helipad were half a dozen black limousines, along with several Secret Service vehicles and a phalanx of motorcycle police outriders. For security reasons, only a handful of officials knew which limousine would transport the shah to the White House, a mere half a mile away. It was the Iranian monarch’s twelfth visit to the United States since assuming the imperial throne thirty-six years before. Over the course of those visits, he had met at the White House with six different American presidents, beginning with Harry Truman. He was now about to meet his seventh: Jimmy Carter.

The shah had been apprehensive about this trip, and for two good reasons. In winning the presidency the previous year, Carter had campaigned on a reformist, clean-government platform. This included, the former governor of Georgia promised, a new emphasis on protecting human rights around the world and a critical reexamination of American arms sales to dictatorial regimes. Both these promises cast an uncomfortable spotlight on Iran. In recent years, a number of organizations had harshly assailed the shah’s regime over its human rights record, and Iran was far and away the largest purchaser of American weapons systems, accounting for nearly half of all such sales in recent years. Senior Carter administration officials had quietly offered the shah reassurances that these high-minded pledges did not apply to him, but the Iranian leader was understandably anxious to hear this from the president personally.

This was joined by a more immediate concern. By 1977, some fifty thousand Iranian students were studying at colleges and universities in the United States, and in recent days a sizable portion of them—as many as four thousand, by some reports—had begun converging on Washington to protest his visit. While overwhelmingly young leftists, their numbers were augmented by a smattering of older Iranian dissidents and exiles, as well as American human rights activists, and they had vowed to give the shah a noisy and embarrassing reception. In fact, they had already put the monarch on notice the previous day, when he had stayed at the preserved colonial village of Williamsburg, Virginia; during the night, the royal couple’s sleep was interrupted by chants from several hundred anti-shah demonstrators gathered a short distance away. Lending their appearance a disquieting quality, many concealed their faces behind paper masks, necessary protection, they claimed, against identification by the shah’s secret police.

In anticipation of the unpleasantness likely to play out in Washington, the Iranian government had reportedly arranged for hundreds of pro-regime members of the Iranian American community to be flown or bused into the capital, including Iranian air force cadets undergoing training at Laughlin Air Force Base in Texas. Along with banners extolling the shah’s leadership and U.S.-Iranian friendship, the pro-shah organizers had distributed two-sided solidarity flags: the U.S. emblem on one side, the Iranian on the other. By midmorning, a forewarned D.C. police force had isolated the two factions on either side of the Ellipse, the great lawn stretching just below the White House, but it made for a tense scene; penned behind flimsy strips of snow fencing about five hundred feet apart, the two groups hurled insults at each other through megaphones, their volume and intensity growing as the time for the shah’s scheduled arrival at the White House drew nearer.

That morning found me on the Ellipse as well, strolling among the police and the handful of reporters occupying the no-man’s-land between the two sides. I was eighteen years old and employed at the Treasury Department headquarters building, immediately adjacent to the White House, as a special aide to the secretary of the Treasury. The nice-sounding title notwithstanding, I was essentially an errand boy, and because the secretary at the time, W. Michael Blumenthal, required very little in the way of erranding, I spent most of my working hours strolling about the city in search of something interesting to do. On the morning of November 15, 1977, nothing looked quite so interesting as the spectacle unfolding on the Ellipse.

At about 10:30 a.m., the shah’s motorcade swung through the iron gates of the White House and came up its semicircular drive, an occasion marked by the start of a twenty-one-gun salute. In hindsight, this customary honor for a visiting head of state might have been a mistake, for the anti-shah protesters on the eastern side of the Ellipse seemed to interpret it rather like the firing of a starting gun. In an instant, hundreds broke through the snow fencing holding them back and began a charge across the great lawn for their opponents. While some of the pro-shah supporters started to flee in panic, a number of the younger men in their midst—the military cadets, judging by their builds and crew cuts—grabbed up whatever potential weapons lay close at hand and similarly rushed forward to battle. Suddenly no-man’s-land, rapidly shrinking as it was, didn’t seem such a great place to be.

For the next two or three minutes—it felt longer at the time—the Ellipse was the scene of a kind of massive street brawl, fists and feet flying, people sent tumbling or running or crawling, such that it was quite impossible to determine who was getting the better of whom. Nor could I be certain of the affiliation of the demonstrator who struck me across the back with a wooden stave with such force it sent me momentarily to the ground, although the power of the blow led me to suspect one of the more physically fit military cadets over some leftist graduate student. When finally the police rushed in with tear gas and billy clubs, there were already a good number of injured scattered about the lawn.

For the ceremony welcoming the shah to the White House, a rostrum had been erected on the South Lawn, before which several hundred invited guests were gathered to hear his and the president’s opening remarks. In hindsight, this tradition, too, was probably a mistake, for no sooner had the two leaders, along with their wives, mounted the stage than the first wafts of the tear gas discharged on the Ellipse began to envelop them. In a famous series of photos taken at the time, both couples try to maintain dignified poses as tears stream down their cheeks.

Concluding the embarrassing display on the South Lawn as quickly as possible—Jimmy Carter would later joke that it was one of the shortest speeches he ever gave—the two couples retreated to the healthier air inside the White House. As Rosalynn Carter led Farah and her entourage off for a coffee reception and traditional “ladies’ tour” of the White House, the two heads of state proceeded to the Cabinet Room, two doors down from the Oval Office. For this meeting, the shah was joined by only two advisors, in contrast to the array of American officials who sat oppo site: President Carter, Vice President Walter Mondale, National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, along with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and several other senior State Department officials.

Also seated at the table was the chief National Security Council (NSC) officer in charge of Iranian affairs, a forty-two-year-old navy captain named Gary Sick. Although he had carried the Iran portfolio at the NSC for two years, Sick was seeing the shah for the first time. “My first thought was how delicate he seemed,” he recalled. “Very elegant, very refined, with this ramrod-straight posture, but the overall impression was of someone rather delicate. From all I’d read about him, all the newsreels I’d watched, I don’t know that I was quite prepared for that.”

There is often a platitudinous quality to these preliminary White House meetings with foreign heads of state, pleasantries combined with an overview of matters to be addressed in more detail later. While the November 15 meeting contained an element of this, it also proved unusually substantive. Several times President Carter stressed that he not only appreciated America’s “special relationship” with Iran but wished to find ways to strengthen it further, a tacit sign that the shah would hear few concerns from the new administration over Iran’s human rights record or profligate arms purchases. For his part, the Iranian king repeated a promise not to seek an increase in oil prices at the upcoming meeting of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), welcome news from the man who’d long been the chief agent of such hikes.

Throughout the ninety-minute meeting, Gary Sick was struck by the shah’s commanding manner. “On our side of the table, there was a lot of informal discussion back-and-forth, but I can’t recall the shah even looking at the two guys he was with; they certainly didn’t have speaking parts. But this was his element: the planned meeting, the laid-out agenda. I found him very impressive, just thoroughly prepared on whatever topic came up.”

Despite the wariness with which the shah had approached this state visit and the chaos accompanying his arrival, it quickly became evident that he and Carter enjoyed a personal rapport, so much so that by the time he and the shahbanou left Washington the following afternoon, the king was in an ebullient mood. To an American diplomat he remarked that the visit could not possibly have gone better, while to a palace advisor he allowed that it was one of the most fruitful trips he had ever made to the American capital. Back in Iran, the state-controlled media carried banner headlines extolling the King of Kings’ triumphant foray abroad, while the consensus in Carter’s White House was that the two days of meetings had been a tremendous success, a further strengthening of the long- standing American-Iranian alliance.

Yet the occasion posed a couple of troubling questions should anyone have chosen to take notice. The violent demonstrations of November 15 had left well over a hundred injured, including twenty-nine policemen, making it the worst day of civil unrest in the nation’s capital in nearly a decade. Fistfights between the warring factions had extended even into the city’s emergency rooms, requiring hospital security guards to segregate pro- and anti-shah demonstrators awaiting medical treatment. Many of the estimated four thousand Iranian students who had come to Washington to denounce the shah were drawn from their nation’s middle and upper classes, and if this was the outlook of those who had most greatly benefited from his rule, what might it say about those inside Iran who lacked such privilege? And while most of the anti-shah demonstrators identified as leftists, they had been joined by members of several conservative Muslim religious groups, so that interspersed with the placards decrying the monarch as a right-wing fascist and American lackey were others accusing him of betraying Islam. Some of those in this latter category carried placards bearing the likeness of one of the shah’s bitterest critics, an aging cleric virtually unknown outside Iran named Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. When was the last time that Washington, or any nation’s capital, saw secular leftists and religious fundamentalists march together in common cause?

But no one did take notice—at least no one in a position to do something about it. Instead, no sooner had the shah departed Washington than White House aides set to planning President Carter’s reciprocal visit to Iran, scheduled for a mere six weeks later, the better to capitalize on the progress being made. At this second meeting, Carter repeated the praise he had showered on the king at the White House, noting that “thanks to the leadership of the shah, Iran is an island of stability in a troubled region.”

Once again, it was almost as if some psychological starting gun had been fired, for within days of Carter’s fulsome tribute there occurred inside Iran the first significant anti-shah protests in over a decade. Initially, these demonstrations were small and easily scattered, but within a few weeks they had metastasized and turned violent. Still, few took notice. By the spring of 1978, protesters had taken to the streets of almost every Iranian town of any size, their cause now imbued with a distinctly religious tilt, but it was only then, six months after his likeness had appeared on demonstrators’ posters in Washington, that The New York Times thought to identify the shah’s chief nemesis, Ruhollah Khomeini, for the first time while managing to get his first name wrong. But still it got worse, and still very few grasped the extent. By that December, with Iran paralyzed by strikes and sliding toward civil war, the death toll from its street battles now reaching into the thousands—into the tens of thousands, according to the opposition—President Carter could still profess full confidence in the shah’s ability to right the situation and persevere. And then, just weeks later, the once unimaginable: After thirty-seven years, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, King of Kings, Light of the Aryans, Shadow of God on Earth, was simply no more, cast into a wandering exile as his regime was engulfed by a revolution few saw coming and none knew how to stop.

Awards

  • WINNER | 2025
    Kirkus Prize for Non-Fiction
  • FINALIST | 2026
    Pulitzer Prize (History)
  • SHORTLIST | 2025
    National Book Critics Circle Awards

Author

© Nanette Burstein
Scott Anderson is a veteran war correspondent who has reported from Lebanon, Israel, Egypt, Northern Ireland, Chechnya, Sudan, Bosnia, El Salvador and many other strife-torn countries. A contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine, his work has also appeared in Vanity Fair, Esquire, Harper’s and Outside. He is the author of two novels and six works of nonfiction, including Lawrence in Arabia, an international bestseller, and most recently King of Kings, the story of the 1978-79 Iranian Revolution, and winner of the 2025 Kirkus Prize for nonfiction. View titles by Scott Anderson

Praise

Named a Best Book of the Year by The Wall Street Journal, The Atlantic, and Vanity Fair

“[A] masterly new account of the Iranian revolution, illustrates the stubborn American blindness that hastened the shah’s demise and helped the mullahs prevail. It was an ‘obliviousness’ that ‘became willful, an ignorance to be maintained and defended,’ Anderson writes. . . . This is an exceptional and important book. Scrupulous and enterprising reporting rarely combine with such superb storytelling.” The New York Times

“Mr. Anderson is a first-rate writer of histories. . . . King of Kings is a sweeping, gripping book, one that makes past times and dead people (often weird, complex and evil) spring to life with its narrative verve and attention to detail. . . . Riveting. . . . Exquisite.” The Wall Street Journal

“A masterful and propulsive account that chronicles a devastatingly transformative series of events whose aftereffects reverberate to this day.” —The Kirkus Prize 2025 Jury

“Anderson succeeds precisely because he eschews structural, quasi-philosophical queries for an energetic account that concerns itself with, as he puts it, ‘a few core questions’. . . . As a result of this inquiry, Anderson finds an answer at once simpler, more instructive, and truer than those of many scholars. . . . Anderson has also consulted the best scholarship on the revolution. . . . Anderson thus offers a readable page-turner that’s also attuned to those core questions. . . . Anderson’s book [is] one of the best on 1979.” The Atlantic

“Veteran journalist Anderson takes readers through the final years of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi’s regime in Iran, tracing the political machinations that kept him in power and the corruption that helped turn the Iranian public against him. It is attentive to both the shah’s own oblivious rule and the world-historical mistakes that his American allies made in their attempt to prop him up.” The Washington Post

King of Kings reads like a blend of a le Carré novel and a Coen Brothers film in the best possible way.” Vanity Fair

“Timely. . . . King of Kings is a lively tale of palace intrigue.” The New Yorker

“Absorbing. . . . Meticulously reported. . . . riveting.” Air Mail

“The outlines of the Iranian Revolution of 1979 are already seared into the American psyche, but this spellbinding book adds fascinating texture and provides a salutary warning for policymakers today. Drawing on the accounts of major players—both American and Iranian—Anderson, a prize-winning journalist and novelist, reconstructs the missteps that contributed to the fall of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, the triumph of the Islamic Revolution, and the transformation of a major American ally into an apparently implacable enemy. . . . Absorbing.” —Foreign Affairs

“Rare is the non-fiction work that can be described as gripping, but King of Kings . . . earns the accolade. . . . Hubris, delusion and catastrophic miscalculation are the elements one expects to find in a Cold War spy thriller, perhaps by John Le Carré. Readers will find King of Kings equally enthralling. . . . A brilliant narrative-history that not only provides a thoroughly readable account of one of the seminal events of the past half-century, but also sheds a bright light on how the religio-political Middle East of 2025 came about. It is highly recommended.” —Jerusalem Post

“A masterful dissection of perhaps the most consequential strategic blunder of the late 20th century. . . . The book reads like a political thriller, yet every page is grounded in meticulous research and sharp analytical insight. . . . Prescient. . . . Compelling. . . . A remarkably engaging work of popular history. The book’s contemporary relevance cannot be overstated. . . . It stands as both a gripping historical narrative and a cautionary tale about the dangers of imperial overconfidence.” —The American Conservative

“Scott Anderson’s King of Kings is a riveting, masterfully told account of how the Shah’s downfall became a tragic turning point in history, as America stumbled blindly into a long and costly conflict that shadows the Middle East to this day. Anderson's clear analysis and vivid storytelling unravel one of the great miscalculations in America's postwar foreign policya must-read that is both urgent and unforgettable.” —Steve Coll, author of Directorate S, winner of the National Book Critics Circle Award, and Ghost Wars, winner of the Pulitzer Prize

“In his masterful and gripping account of the Iranian revolution, Scott Anderson gives us a page-turning history lesson that is more relevant than ever: A story of American diplomatic blunders and miscalculations that led to the loss of a vital ally and the commencement of hostilities that have roiled the world for nearly four decades. Taking us inside the fortified walls of the shah’s palaces, King of Kings lays bare the folly and hubris that led to the shah’s demise, the hostage crisis and a radical theocracy that would reshape the Middle East.”
—Rajiv Chandrasekaran, author of National Book Award finalist Imperial Life in the Emerald City

“Instantly absorbing, King of Kings is an exhilarating plunge into the psychology of unchecked power, which secludes, blinds, and ultimately betrays its holders. Anderson is a master of the telling detail; he gives us lessons not only from the Shah’s undoing but also from Washington’s weakness for rigid assumptions—until history, as it so often does, shatters the illusion of control.”
—Evan Osnos, author of the National Book Award winner Age of Ambition

“Anderson’s brilliant new account of the events leading to the shah’s fall is both masterful and mesmerizing. With bracing clarity, drawing from interviews with direct participants, King of Kings shows senior Iranian and U.S. officials sleepwalking into a disaster with global consequences—and one that was far from inevitable. A must-read for anyone looking to understand the origins of the Middle East’s most dangerous regime.”
—Joby Warrick, author of Black Flags: The Rise of ISIS, winner of the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction

“The Iranian Revolution was one of the most momentous events of the Twentieth Century, one whose reverberations continue to shape the Middle East. In this highly readable and probing book, Scott Anderson revisits the events of that critical year, and draws on previously unknown information to chart the course of events that made what seemed improbable to become inevitable: the fall of the monarchy before a triumphant revolution.”
—Vali Nasr, Professor of International Affairs and Middle East Studies at the School of Advanced Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the author of Iran’s Grand Strategy: A Political History

“Scott Anderson’s thrilling, fully authoritative work takes us behind the scenes of US decision-making blunders as the country’s leaders fumbled the Iranian revolution, losing the US’s most critical ally in the Middle East. Nearly a half century later, this is the gold standard account of the Shah’s fall, with fresh dramatic tales and arresting details from the last living players. An epic and heart-breaking tragedy.”
—Azadeh Moaveni, author of Lipstick Jihad: A Memoir of Growing up Iranian in America and American in Iran

“Anderson uses his incomparable prose to crack open the deep story behind one of the most momentous events of the last decades. An important and riveting book.”
Sebastian Junger, New York Times bestselling author of The Perfect Storm and War

“Written with a journalist’s instincts and the plotlines of a thriller, King of Kings is the most compelling account yet of the revolution in Iran—an event so significant that it continues to shape world affairs today. An outstanding book.”
Eugene Rogan, author of The Fall of the Ottomans

“King of Kings chronicles the fall of Iran's Shah—a man feared by many but understood by few. This account examines how hubris, Cold War tensions, and revolutionary fervor toppled a monarchy whose ruler pursued modernization while remaining fatally disconnected from his people, the shockwaves of which still reverberate through international relations today.”
—Bradley Hope, bestselling co-author of Billion Dollar Whale and Blood and Oil

King of Kings delivers remarkable new insights into one of history’s least understood upheavals—the Iranian revolution. Rich in detail and gripping portraits of the individuals at the heart of the tragedy, this book gets to the essence of how this unique revolution succeeded—and why it cannot be replicated.”
Kim Ghattas, author of Black Wave

Scott Anderson vividly describes, in unerringly forensic detail, how American foreign policy makers completely misread—as indeed they continue to misread—the Middle East and all its complexities, with consequences that reverberate to this day.”
—Diana Darke, author of Stealing from the Saracens

“Wry, acute, forensically reported, deeply researched, King of Kings is a brilliantly absorbing, page-turning account of the Iranian Revolution. Scott Anderson is one of the very best narrative historians writing today. From the seething streets, to the filigree of Palace intrigue and the politics of American interests, he captures the opportunism, self-delusion and ineptitude that ploughed a furrow across the face of the modern Middle East. It’s a perfect lesson for our times: history has no idea what it’s doing.”
—Wendell Steavenson, author of The Weight of a Mustard Seed

“A clear-eyed account of a difficult, complex man and his self-inflicted fall from grace.” —The Guardian

“An excellent narrative account of the two tumultuous years that resulted in the triumph of Ayatollah Khomeini and the creation of an Islamic republic. . . . [Anderson] has done scrupulous research on the final months of the Shah’s fading rule.” —The Telegraph

“An authoritative, well-reported and elegantly written account of the fall of the Shah of Iran and the rise of the Ayatollah Khomeini. If you want to understand the turmoil in Gaza, Syria and beyond, then the Iranian Revolution of 1979 is a good place to start.” —The Times

“For those seeking to understand this seemingly endless state of conflict between Israel, the US and Iran and the blood-soaked rivalries that drive conflict in the Middle East today, Scott Anderson’s new book is a good place to start. King of Kings recounts how imperial Pahlavi Iran went form a hyper-rich, secular leaning ‘Peacock’ throne, firmly allied to the west, a playground for American oil executives to the dour, repressive Islamist autocracy we know today, locked in perpetual conflict within and without its borders, isolated and seeking a nuclear bomb. . . . Anderson brilliantly tells this tale.” —The Financial Times

“Chaos is strewn by foolhardy leaders acting on bad information in this riveting history of the Iranian revolution. . . . Anderson’s story builds a rushing momentum as one miscalculation after another hurtles the country toward the 1979 ‘revolution few saw coming and no one knew how to stop.’ The result is an illuminating, operatic depiction of the revolution as a farcical cavalcade of arrogant mistakes with dire consequences.”
Publishers Weekly (starred)

“As Anderson lays out with meticulous reporting and consummate storytelling, many of Iran’s spectacular gains—and along with them, its once-inviolable alliance with the U.S.—came undone with the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the ascent of Ayatollah Khomeini. . . . Though the Iranian Revolution unfolded more than 45 years ago, the now-fraught U.S.-Iran relationship remains front and center, and there are still hard-won lessons to glean about the costs of inattention.”
—Booklist
(starred)


“A thoroughgoing history of the last years of the Pahlavi dynasty and the rise of the Islamist theocracy in Iraq. . . . An eye-opening history of how Iran became a point on the ‘axis of evil’ and is considered such a dangerous enemy today.”
—Kirkus Reviews (starred)